BP says it "will take time & investment" to move toward renewable energy. This is dangerous and misguided. Why? – Physics has already set the timeline for us. We're out of time. – Climate delaying is the new climate denying. If we go at BP's pace we'll face catastrophic warming
-
-
Not sure it’s misguided It’s just a fact. And it’s not BPs pace it’s societal. Sadly we are not going to wean the huge population growth off hydrocarbons anytime soon. That growth needs cheap reliable sources of energy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If we don't do this, we will put hundreds of millions of lives at risk (possibly more), unravel our institutions and economy. We could also set off tipping points causing irreversible warming. Many futures are still open to us at this point, based on our actions & decisions now.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Emily Ironically the current set up underpins the economy & is saving millions of lives. Solutions to a lower carbon future need to address short term economic impacts & the benefit hydrocarbons brings to developing countries. If not we are whistling in the wind.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Emily Cunningham Retweeted Emily Cunningham
Have you seen what the World Bank (a conservative body itself) says about this?https://twitter.com/emahlee/status/1162661680527990794 …
Emily Cunningham added,
Emily Cunningham @emahleeReplying to @BP_plc @BishyhilaryBP: "oil & gas needed to help world grow & prosper"..."billions being lifted out of poverty." World Bank: "climate change is an acute threat to efforts to end poverty. Without urgent action, climate change impacts could push additional 100 million people into poverty by 2030."2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yip I’m sure that is the case and that’s why this is difficult. It’s about transitioning energy supply that allow us to be able to deal with the immediate needs of the worlds population and position ourselves for a low carbon future.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Emily Cunningham Retweeted Emily Cunningham
Big Oil's response? Delay delay delay. Predatory, immoral delay. Sometimes to their own peril:https://twitter.com/emahlee/status/1140552712360099841 …
Emily Cunningham added,
Emily Cunningham @emahleeGE lost billions by 'misjudging' renewables: report "GE lost a 'simply staggering' $193 billion in just three years to 2018 -- amounting to almost three quarters of its market capitalisation." h/t @chickamade https://news.yahoo.com/ge-lost-billions-misjudging-renewables-report-114015514.html …Show this thread2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Example of collective will missing are the Gilet Jaune protesting against increased taxes on fuel ..... carbon taxation is exactly what’s needed to drive consumer change, but no-one likes that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
There are many policies to implement and experiment with what works. When you have multi-millionaire CEOs and fossil fuel execs raking in profits, and FF companies offloading the hidden costs (there are huge health costs of pollution), maybe experiment in that direction...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think we get into a little bit of a lazy narrative on this big oil thing. Of the top 10 oil producers globally 7 are state owned and produce 82% of the oil of the top 10. So multi millionaire fat cats are not particularly relevant, but we like to point the finger regardless.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
MA is suing Exxon right now. Meh, big enough for the state of MA is big enough for me. It's just the beginning in the kind of litigation we'll see.https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2019/1/7/18172275/supreme-court-exxon-climate-change-massachusetts …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.