In order to have a shot at staying within 1.5° warming, we must "rapidly reduce and eliminate all production and use of coal, oil, and natural gas and invent and scale up negative emissions technology."
-
Show this thread
-
2° warming "wld mean rising sea levels, freshwater shortages, reduced agricultural productivity, food stress, & the conflicts & emigration that come in their wake." "A lot of people will die, & not because they burn to death. It'll be because we don't have enough food & water."
1 reply 3 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
The difference "between 1.5C of warming and.... 2C [is] a significantly lower risk of drought, floods, heatwaves and poverty for hundreds of millions of people."https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jan/15/immediate-fossil-fuel-phaseout-could-arrest-climate-change-study …
1 reply 2 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
"Climate change could be kept in check if a phaseout of all fossil fuel infrastructure were to begin immediately, according to research." "keeping within the 1.5C limit is possible if radical action is taken immediately."
1 reply 2 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
“Whether it’s drilling a new gas well, keeping an old coal power station open, or even buying a diesel car, the choices we make today will largely determine the climate pathways of tomorrow."
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likesShow this thread -
“The hard part is not wrestling with how bad things could get–it’s understanding how much responsibility we still have to make things better.” ~
@AlexSteffen From "Climate change is inevitable. How bad it gets is a choice" by@eillieanzihttps://www.fastcompany.com/90318242/climate-change-is-inevitable-how-bad-it-gets-is-a-choice …1 reply 2 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Again: Amazon has a choice. Recall the difference in devastation between 1.5 and 2 warming. Recall that "keeping within the 1.5C limit is possible if radical action is taken immediately." Now recall Amazon boasting it can help oil companies "optimize production & profitability.”
1 reply 3 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
From one of Amazon's public case studies: “Historically, [pipeline] routes were plotted using paper maps, and it would take a month to get a route. With PPRO, now we can do it in about eight hours.” This is both terrifying and sickening given what's at stake.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likesShow this thread -
Case study link:https://aws.amazon.com/solutions/case-studies/willbros/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
The climate science is known. The data is known. Amazon knows what's at stake yet chooses to firmly align itself on the wrong side of history. With powerful fossil fuel interests which are hell bent on making as much money as they can while they burn down our future.
2 replies 4 retweets 5 likesShow this thread
More excellent reporting from @bcmerchant's on this topic:
Amazon Is Aggressively Pursuing Big Oil as It Stalls Out on Clean Energyhttps://gizmodo.com/amazon-is-aggressively-pursuing-big-oil-as-it-stalls-ou-1833875828 …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.