The astounding Dr Lina Brand Correa @librand3. Lina is a researcher of all trades: she can do super complicated quantitative work (like this paper) and pioneer super innovative qualitative and conceptual research on human needs and energy services. Wow.
https://environment.leeds.ac.uk/see/staff/1648/dr-lina-brand-correa …
-
Show this thread
-
And last but not least Lukas Hardt
@lukas_hardt who is working on topics of macro-models of energy and economy. Watch out for this one! He's on his way to untangling some really complex problems and contribute to solutions. https://environment.leeds.ac.uk/see/staff/1708/lukas-hardt …2 replies 3 retweets 21 likesShow this thread -
And I have to point out that all members of the Leeds EROI
#Squad are early-career researchers, reasonably fresh out of PhD (or not even), working in their "spare" time on this joint project which is not specifically funded by any one grant. This is the best of science. END!2 replies 1 retweet 30 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @JKSteinberger
@exergy_paul@dr_anneowen@librand3@lukas_hardt Thank you for publishing this paper. Question re decline of fossil fuel ROI "will lead to constraints on the energy available to society" -- couldn't governments continue to massively subsidize fossil fuels like they do now?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emahlee @JKSteinberger and
If governments continue to subsidize the fossil fuel industry, it would seem that (though wildly irresponsible and immoral) we would still have enough energy available to society through fossil fuels. Where am I wrong? Can you please help me to understand this?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emahlee @JKSteinberger and
It’s to do with how much energy you have to use to get more energy. Not money.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @keithalexander @JKSteinberger and
Ok, There's still something I'm not getting. What about... "the profound impact of rapid technological advances in drilling. Fracking unlocked vast sums of oil and natural gas that had been trapped underground. Drilling costs declined dramatically."https://money.cnn.com/2018/09/12/investing/us-oil-production-russia-saudi-arabia/index.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emahlee @keithalexander and
Even with the declining costs of oil extraction wrt fracking, we will still have problematic "constraints on the energy available to society?" Btw, I'm trying to understand this paper better so I can explain and champion its findings and implications to others more effectively.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emahlee @keithalexander and
Hi Emily, sorry I'm coming to the discussion a bit late. This paper is about energy, not money. If we have a certain amount of energy to invest, where would you invest it? To me it's a "no-brainer" to go to the place where that energy gives you the highest returns.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @librand3 @keithalexander and
Thanks for all your replies. I really appreciate it. I guess I was asking about the money because we don't do a lot of "no brainer" things based on money and greed. It sounds like the money would align though with this particular "no brainer." Thanks again for your explanations.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Emily Cunningham Retweeted Emily Cunningham
Did you see that Bloomberg wrote about your study?https://twitter.com/emahlee/status/1151583503466713089?s=21 …
Emily Cunningham added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.