Three protestors are still on the top of the New York Times overhang.pic.twitter.com/xYN34f3e2A
Show this thread
-
Meanwhile you’re getting criticisms left and right about NYT coverage of the climate crisis while you’re pouring your soul into this work. If was in your shoes I know my first reaction would be to want to defend what the NYT is already doing.
Could there be space to consider that — as hard as all of us are working on climate — no one is yet rising far enough to the challenge? To have room to reimagine? To try different approaches? Experiments? I want you and the NYT to succeed.
-
-
I want the public to have a true sense of the existential threat we're facing and the urgency. What do *you* think it will take for them to understand this? To help them understand what concrete things need to happen for us to avoid the worst of what's coming?
-
The sustainability team analogy might be a good one; even the best sustainability ppl can’t, alone, make a company good on climate if they are siloed or lack adequate influence. I wonder if the protests will prompt those at NYT who really need to reflect on this to do so.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
And I agree that we need to always do better, and strive to find ways to tell these stories in ways that will grip people and give them a better sense of the urgency of these issues. There is no complacency here.
-
It's clear you're that you yourself aren't complacent. Yet, when I look at the NYT in it's entirety, I don't walk away with an understanding of the extremely urgent, deep crisis we're in. How can that shift so that climate coverage is part of NYT's DNA? https://www.cjr.org/special_report/climate-change-media.php …pic.twitter.com/rU21VLBjQB
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.