I mean, 100% as a goal is never going to be achievable until the entire world is at 100% renewable, setting a date would be a recipe for losing trust. We could say AWS Data Centers at 100% renewable by x date, but all of supply chain, last mile, and third party sellers?
-
-
Replying to @unruly_tuples @emahlee
Like, yes, commit to a firm, revolutionary leadership stance on this. Yes, big changes are needed now, not incremental changes. The problem space is complex. Meaningful, necessary, important and running out of time for actions to matter. Still complex.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @unruly_tuples
Agreed. But we're good at complex! What I think is very exciting is Amazon's ability to be a transformative force for change. If it decided to be. We could drive change at "all of supply chain, last mile, and third party sellers." We could change whole industries. That's huge!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emahlee @unruly_tuples
"It seems daunting to ask a company to go to the very ends of the supply chain. But indeed, sometimes you have to do that to find the biggest impact.. That makes companies like Amazon, who are at a key nexus in the supply chain, a huge lever for positive change.”
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emahlee @unruly_tuples
That's from
@bromano's reporting. His piece was on the cover of the Sunday's Seattle Times print edition:https://www.seattletimes.com/business/amazon/employees-are-pressuring-amazon-to-become-a-leader-on-climate-heres-how-that-could-work/ …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emahlee @unruly_tuples
Walmart "expanded its supply-chain work with a project to avoid a billion metric tons of emissions."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emahlee @unruly_tuples
"As the largest grocer in the U.S., Walmart worked with its supply chain and asked for changes at the farm level, helping farmers more precisely apply fertilizer, which saved them money and reduced emissions."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emahlee @unruly_tuples
From Forbes: Walmart -- "in just two years, more than 1,000 suppliers have signed on to the initiative and collectively avoided 93 million metric tons of emissions towards the billion-ton GHG reduction goal"https://www.forbes.com/sites/edfenergyexchange/2019/04/26/employees-of-the-month-amazons-climate-activists/#2a343b006be2 …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emahlee
A: You can't really say "from Forbes" when it's a contributor (glorified blogger, unpaid) and not a staff writer (paid journalist) B: The methodology for Walmart's calculation is self-report from suppliers - https://www.walmartsustainabilityhub.com/media-library/document/2018-project-gigaton-accounting-methodology/_proxyDocument?id=00000165-159f-d0cc-ab77-95ff84350000 … What's the validity on that?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @unruly_tuples
A. Journalism's business model is turning into a contract model where there are less and less paid journalists. "Published in Forbes"... whatever you want to call it is fine by me. The point remains: Walmart is addressing their supply chain and making a dent.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
B. I haven't looked closely into this. I'm guessing there are major flaws? Ok, let's jump far ahead of them and have them follow... us.
-
-
Replying to @emahlee
Great! I'm on board. How do we know we aren't? It would have been easy, low-hanging fruit to follow the Walmart model and have feel good numbers that don't change things. I haven't been at Amazon long, so how would we as employees know if a project exists?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.