This is what the employee asked:pic.twitter.com/Sa8piOoWAT
Show this thread
-
"As the largest grocer in the U.S., Walmart worked with its supply chain and asked for changes at the farm level, helping farmers more precisely apply fertilizer, which saved them money and reduced emissions."
From Forbes: Walmart -- "in just two years, more than 1,000 suppliers have signed on to the initiative and collectively avoided 93 million metric tons of emissions towards the billion-ton GHG reduction goal"https://www.forbes.com/sites/edfenergyexchange/2019/04/26/employees-of-the-month-amazons-climate-activists/#2a343b006be2 …
-
-
A: You can't really say "from Forbes" when it's a contributor (glorified blogger, unpaid) and not a staff writer (paid journalist) B: The methodology for Walmart's calculation is self-report from suppliers - https://www.walmartsustainabilityhub.com/media-library/document/2018-project-gigaton-accounting-methodology/_proxyDocument?id=00000165-159f-d0cc-ab77-95ff84350000 … What's the validity on that?
-
A. Journalism's business model is turning into a contract model where there are less and less paid journalists. "Published in Forbes"... whatever you want to call it is fine by me. The point remains: Walmart is addressing their supply chain and making a dent.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.