"Bezos did address employee questions about the climate." This implies that he answered our questions, which he did not. As @heyjohnryan reports, Bezos "sidestepped" our 1st question, and "did not respond" to our second.
https://www.kuow.org/stories/employees-confront-bezos-over-amazon-s-carbon-problem …https://twitter.com/toddbishop/status/1131617789301542912 …
-
-
That's a fair read. I guess, to me, 100% renewable energy in our datacenters someday is a tangible commitment in a way "reduce our impact by x amount" is suspect, given the general methodologies for calculating carbon are imprecise and often unreliable.
-
The US has to be net zero emissions by 2030 for the world to stay below 1.5°C of global heating. We absolutely need dates and to work aggressively toward them. Btw, did you know that goal of 100% renewable energy wasn't just for data centers, but "our global infrastructure"?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Color me skeptical, but how can we say we're a leader on climate, and then partner with fossil fuel companies to accelerate and expand oil extraction?
-
How can we be thinking about climate as a strategic driver of our risks and opportunities if the highest ranking Sustainability person in the company wasn't aware of our oil and gas business until we told her about it in March?
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.