Emily Cunningham

7) Under no circumstances should anyone talking about responses to climate change talk about anything like distribution, resource access or equity.

8) However, 7) doesn't apply if talking about workers in legacy fossil fuel industries or energy access for developing people.

9) Whatever we do, it's very important that government doesn't pick winners. That would be horrendous. We should first see which winners emerge over an unspecified time frame.

10) If referring to the Paris Agreement, only refer to Article 4(1) but ignore "best available science". OR refer to Article 2(1) but ignore 1.5C.

11) But probably don't even read the Paris Agreement and definitely don't check with anyone who has expertise in it because what would they know?

12) Don't talk to climate scientists or read any climate science research because how could it possibly be relevant to policy or economics. (This is partly how we ended up thinking 4C of warming will only incur minor costs.)

13) Make declarations on clean energy potential without first looking at latest LCOEs or advances in storage technology.

14) Imply that anyone concerned about climate change is hypocritical if they in any way use fossil fuels.