Some experts estimate fossil fuel companies will lose 40-100% of their value in a market correction. If Amazon is identified as being attached to & dependent on fossil fuels, they will also suffer though not as much. Let's say 5% of a correction cost. That’s a TON of money. 15/
-
Show this thread
-
A non-trivial question is: What are the brand risks? What are public perception risks? Amazon has worked hard to get the brand to a certain level. So much of marketing is avoiding brand damage, of maintain positive perception, while not doing anything that screws it all up. 16/
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likesShow this thread -
Someone has evaluated the value of Amazon's brand as a component of its total value. There are more nonlinear events that are changing public perception that threaten to put a dent in its brand considering its position vis-à-vis fossil fuels and lack of climate leadership. 17/
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likesShow this thread -
What if there were a 20 point shift in public opinion on the climate issue? How would that effect Amazon's brand given it's inaction on climate and partnerships with fossil fuel companies? 18/
1 reply 2 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
Think giant movements like the student strike movement or
@extinctionR. If Amazon became a target because of it's inaction on climate & helping fossil fuel companies "optimize production & profitability" it would certainly lose money.@GretaThunberg#FridaysForFuture /191 reply 9 retweets 26 likesShow this thread -
How does a company reduce its vulnerability? Transition costs don’t get cheaper with delay. Sure, energy may get cheaper, but there're political changes that might implement charges, fees, carbon taxes, etc which can happen faster than an unprepared company can respond to. 20/
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
Markets and politics can happen on a bigger, faster scale than transition can keep up with if a company is behind. For instance, big solar installations shipping from China can take 4 months. Other expenses that don't get cheaper: the cost to buy expertise. 21/
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likesShow this thread -
There’s financial risk of being caught behind the curve. Will it be more difficult for Amazon to borrow? What are the competitive disadvantages risks? What are Amazon’s financial risks and transition costs compared to its competitors if it comes to this late in the game? 22/
1 reply 2 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
Underscore: NONE OF THE RISKS AND TRANSITION COSTS GET BETTER FOR AMAZON BY DELAYING ACTION. There’s no business case argument for delay, if we assume Amazon is going to have to change—and it will. Delaying only increases risk, cost, and vulnerability. 23/
2 replies 4 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @emahlee
I agree there's uncertainty, but this ↑ can't be generally true. Decarbonizing the delivery fleet is highly deflationary; eVans will only get better & cheaper. Best case: delay any action and time the change just ahead of the crash. Fools believing that they CAN is the problem.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
What's needed is a "broad accounting of the true costs and benefits of transitioning quickly." EVans may cost more than diesel vans at face value, but the point is, buying them minimizes other risks and associated costs.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.