But I also don't think we've lost everything. There's still a lot to loose. People don't understand how much has already been lost and what's at stake, though. Otherwise initiative 1631 would have passed in WA state, or climate would be everyone's #1 issue (which it should be).
-
This framing struck me as problematic, if not inaccurate: "we're going to lose, but we must fight—as moral people—anyways." Of course we must. But I fight because of what's possible AND because I couldn't live with myself if I didn't. https://twitter.com/daveregrets/status/1079564979584389120 …
This Tweet is unavailable.
In other words, not doing the right thing, not taking brave stands on climate change would cost me a large chunk of myself, of my humanity. Something I'm not willing to swallow, as I'm also not willing to watch silently as our beautiful world is burned down.
-
-
But do I think I'm fighting just to fight and what I do is an inconsequential lost cause even if it might be the right, moral thing? Hell no! I absolutely think what I (and others) do makes a difference, even if I'll never know the impact it had.
-
I will continue to be heartbroken daily over what has already been lost and will be lost, but I know too, that so much MORE can be lost if people like you and me and a growing number of countless others don't fight.
- 14 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.