This reminds me a lot of @sallesino's beautiful ilustration of facts as colored points and beliefs as 
colored glasses that only let their color through.pic.twitter.com/3CP4c4mhn6
Show this thread
Imagine facts as points. People may see different shapes in them. A point is signal or noise depending on your shape.
You don’t have to disagree on which dots exist or where they are. Savage fights can happen without factual disagreement!
~@everytstudies https://everythingstudies.com/2016/06/02/partial-derivatives-and-partial-narratives/ …pic.twitter.com/jcbC6h0c3J
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This seems a little too easy, doesn't it? Just saying ...
-
I don't think so. It just speeds up one step on the way to finding the crux of a disagreement: Do we disagree on the facts? Often, the answer is no; we just disagree on which facts are significant & which patterns are relevant. So let's argue about that rather than the facts.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I like this but I can't help but fret over the actual regressions presented, and the fact that there *is* a procedure for deciding which one is more likely to model the data (it could be neither)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just because a pattern is emergent doesn't make it subjective.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes. Coincidentally saw this visualization a few moments before seeing yours:https://twitter.com/stevestuwill/status/1069756255835586560?s=21 …
0:25Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.