Almost all coverage back then said hydrogen fuel cells would destroy electric cars & autonomy was between 10 years & never …https://twitter.com/Everman/status/1120466365834514432 …
-
-
Hey self-proclaimed genius: There's *no such thing* as 500% less.
$TSLAQ -
500/100 is just an improper fraction. It's still a valid ratio.
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
.
@elonmusk Any car has small risk of fire but any way you look at it electric & Tesla cars are safer compared 2 gasoline cars.  Feb.14 was a gasoline car park fire in#CHINA burning out a whole car park, DESTROYING 32 CARS & INJURING 36 people!$TSLA http://www.thatsmags.com/china/post/26885/32-cars-destroyed-36-people-hospitalized-after-fire-in-shenzhen …pic.twitter.com/ZB1E23pa0L
-
The media hypocrisy is staggering, brother Martin!!!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
-
Source: https://redd.it/bg2rib Even though they do have less cars on the road, if you compare them statistically. On average and in a sense, in a "per capita" basis. The average car still catches on fire way more often than an Tesla. And EVs in general.pic.twitter.com/V3eflv1tcP
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
What percentage of luxury cars <5 years old catch fire? And WTF is "500% less"? Aren't you supposed to be some kind of pseudo engineer?
-
Thank you. Anyone who understands probabilities or statistics should laugh heartily when someone says X is 500% less likely than Y. Lies, damn lies, and [Elon Musk's] statistics.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Parking garage full of combustion engine cars (January 2018)...pic.twitter.com/FAsKuqtMFo
-
They, whoever "they" are, want us to forget about that one.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.