Reminder to 'tactical' voters: N Hfds is NOT a marginal seat. 2015: Con 56%, LD 12%, Lab 11%, Green 7%. Vote for what you really believe in!
-
-
Replying to @ellie_chowns @bircherbeequeen
Ignores 14% UKIP vote and fact that prior to 2015 collapse, lib dems were on 32% alone. Tactical voting is only way to make change happen.
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @garethlucas89 @ellie_chowns
Assuming UKIP vote lower, won't those votes go to Tories or no vote? And are Lib Dems forgiven yet?
#PR is best hope for change1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bircherbeequeen @ellie_chowns
It's hard to know tbh, LD collapse seemed to benefit all including UKIP. I'll always be an advocate for tactical voting until reform happens
2 replies . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @garethlucas89 @ellie_chowns
Having never in 33 years voted for a candidate (or party) who won, I'm getting a bit cynical. (Could stop living in safe Tory seats!)
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes
Tactical voting works in key marginals but just doesn't apply in North Hfds. Vote for best party & candidate
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.