I'm always baffled by these so-called feminists intent on defining womanhood by physical, often reproductive characteristics for the sake of excluding trans people. As though we haven't fought a long battle to have women seen as more than their bodies and repreoductive ability.
-
-
Show this thread
-
At the bare minimum (and I'm setting the bar incredibly low), people who menstruate is simply the most relevant descriptive term when talking about menstrual health and the issues that effect people who have bodies that menstruate.
Show this thread -
Whilst there are aspects of menstrual health & issues like period poverty that are impacted by patriarchy, that does not mean it is just women who effected. Patriarchy can harm all genders and to deny this is to deny the lived experience of millions of people across time.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I’m so angry. And sad. And angry.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Some women can be born female but be born without a uterus.
-
Also, birth control exists and that can stop menstruation AKA progesterone only BC.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Also some men and N/B menstruate! If that’s her concern why on show some love to them instead of invalidating women who don’t! She’s always been trash, glad the world is waking up.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also some people with eating disorders and people on some medications
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Rowling was mocking an article that hoped for better rights for "people who menstruate." You should be attacking that article for not including women who don't menstruate.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.