body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Help Center

Conversation

Elizabeth Joh

@elizabeth_joh

EFF Files Amicus Briefs in Two Important Geofence Search Warrant Cases eff.org/deeplinks/2023 via

@eff

eff.org

EFF Files Amicus Briefs in Two Important Geofence Search Warrant Cases

Should the police be able to identify everyone who was in a busy metropolitan area, just because a crime occurred there? In two amicus briefs just filed in appellate courts, we argue that’s a clearly

5:18 PM · Feb 1, 2023

1,796

Views

Replying to

and

The downplaying of the search issue in these briefs is fascinating. Do they think the courts are not going to notice? (Although to its credit, the EFF brief at least doesn't pretend the issue doesn't exist.)