The LF's model seems more targeted, and their pricing is better. There are more rules about which projects qualify, and the first 10M of basic processing fees are covered. Both seem like they'd make them inherently incompatible?
-
-
-
I'd understand if LF wants to scratch its own itch, but the feature set looks rather similar to Open Collective than it is different to it. I'd expect this from any company but not from the Linux Foundation. We are all basically neighbours
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Fragmentation in this community happens usually when capital interests clash. This defeats communal, ethical and practical goals of free culture.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


