It’s not accurate for the reasons I stated above. But even assuming it were accurate, you would still be wrong that crime is down. Non-violent crime has skyrocketed (article says by 40%, which is underreported). Violent crime is down because everybody was on lock down.
-
-
Replying to @SafewordCapital @commieboudin and
…Do you need me to explain to you what data is?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @elinalynne @commieboudin and
do i need to explain to you how to interpret data? you haven't responded to a single point i made. I said you're incorrect even if the data is right, which it is not.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SafewordCapital @commieboudin and
What response should I provide a man having a tantrum? What would be the point? You don't actually care about what is happening in reality. You have adopted a narrative, and no fact I can offer will lead you to rethink it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @elinalynne @commieboudin and
it's funny because i was just thinking the exact thing about you. you're not really responding to anything i say, which is actually not coming from a place of anger, just logic. but you seem to lack that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SafewordCapital @commieboudin and
Logic is based on facts. Still waiting for you to provide the data that proves the article's claims wrong.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @elinalynne @SafewordCapital and
Still waiting for you to prove the data in your sample is an accurate representation of the population. Go ahead, data scientist, we’ll wait.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @commieboudin @SafewordCapital and
Which sample would that be? The data I linked to are the crime stats for San Francisco, provided by SFPD. Do you find them to be an accurate representation of the population?https://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/stay-safe/crime-data/crime-dashboard …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @elinalynne @SafewordCapital and
Since you’re the one who’s relying on that dataset, the onus is on you to prove that the sample that data represents accurately depicts the population from which it is sampled. Once again, go ahead, we’ll wait.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @commieboudin @elinalynne and
As a reminder, this is the very premise upon which the field of statistics is based... so surely you can do this analysis.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Wow. In the last hour your standards have dramatically increased. First you didn't know what data was. Now no data set is complete enough for your liking. If no data set is even trustworthy, what can we even perform an analysis on?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.