They can also say, “Well if u thought lying about an extramarital affair warranted removal then u cannot credibly argue that shaking down an ally for personal gain by unlawfully withholding already-appropriated aid does not warrant removal.” There can now be no “so what” defense.
-
-
-
Starr also searched the then 13 yr old chelseas bedroom.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Let’s not forget he reopened the investigation of Vince Foster’s suicide.
-
And worked hand in hand with the group who privately set up and financed the Paula Jones civil case as a pretext to get Clinton to testify under oath. THE PRESIDENT'S TRIAL: THE LAWSUIT; Quietly, a Team of Lawyers Kept Paula Jones's Case Alivehttps://www.nytimes.com/1999/01/24/us/president-s-trial-lawsuit-quietly-team-lawyers-kept-paula-jones-s-case-alive.html …
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
And Dershowitz? What's your thought on him? Who can argue at an equivalent level.. on the House side?
-
Schiff is virtually a perfect antidote to Dershowitz. He has a finely organized mine, great memory, keen attention to intellect, amazing self-control and is virtually unflappable. This lends him a gravitas that gives weight to his words that increases the more you watch him. 1/
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Because lying about sex is impeachable but bribery is not.
-
The blue dress is ready to be picked up, cleaned and pressed the same won’t be said about all of the evidence and witnesses who have yet to be presented.pic.twitter.com/1TojMwqWuS
Ovo je potencijalno osjetljiv multimedijski sadržaj. Saznajte više
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
They can also say something like " As the President's attorney and numerous Senator's know personally, the Senate in President Clinton's trial heard new witness testimony not considered by the House."
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
how long did his investigation take? he doesn't have all that info in front of him. The House Managers know the case in and out.
-
They don’t need the case. They don’t argue truth. They just need to hide evidence and block witnesses.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.