This is phenomenally good! Lots of people think environmental review protects the environment because it has the word “environmental” in it. But it’s purely a procedural requirement with zero substantive protection. All it does is delay stuff. A+https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/09/climate/trump-nepa-environment.html …
-
-
Reforming NEPA could be the poster child for what
@tylercowen calls State Capacity Libertarianism. https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2020/01/what-libertarianism-has-become-and-will-become-state-capacity-libertarianism.html … If you set out deliberately to destroy state capacity to develop modern infrastructure and clean energy, you would want to pass something like NEPA.Prikaži ovu nit -
Not an EPA regulation (and it doesn’t protect the planet)https://twitter.com/MikeBloomberg/status/1215320410373414913 …
Prikaži ovu nit -
Does not affect drinking water standardshttps://twitter.com/RepBarbaraLee/status/1215364368977801216 …
Prikaži ovu nit -
Good for high-speed rail and good for Americanshttps://twitter.com/SenatorMenendez/status/1215346837659496450 …
Prikaži ovu nit -
Canada passed the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act in 2012. It: - Reduced the scope of the federal government in reviews - Limited timeline to 2 years - Only “directly affected” parties can intervene So Trump is trying to make us more like Canada.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Here’s an example of how NEPA review has harmed an offshore wind project, as reported by known right-wing news site
@WBURhttps://www.wbur.org/earthwhile/2019/08/09/vineyard-wind-project-delayed …Prikaži ovu nit -
-
The official proposed NEPA reg changes are now live: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-01-10/pdf/2019-28106.pdf … As
@EnergyLawProf notes, the changes largely codify existing case law. Part I of the preamble also has a nice NEPA explainer for those new to the issue.https://twitter.com/EnergyLawProf/status/1215494413549481985 …Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Well "should" was the wrong word. It should have been "shall."pic.twitter.com/ykUR4Mqfho
-
The new proposed regs literally make this change.pic.twitter.com/iPLaIIQYvW
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.