American National Election Studies (ANES)

@electionstudies

The ANES collects high quality, non-partisan survey data on voting and public opinion. Tweeting about new data, analyses by the public and more.

Stanford, CA & Ann Arbor, MI
Joined September 2011

Tweets

You blocked @electionstudies

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @electionstudies

  1. New publication in by Ross Butters () and Christopher Hare () combine 2000 ANES Time Series and 2016 CCES data: Polarized Networks? New Evidence on American Voters’ Political Discussion Networks

    Undo
  2. Oct 6

    Check out my first piece (co-authored with ⁦) at ⁦. We argue that our collective obsession w/partisanship masks diversity & complexity of Black people’s politics. Bonus: brief syllabus for thinking more about this diversity.

    Undo
  3. New research from the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology studies county-level voter unhappiness and Trump's electoral success. Study led by and uses and the ANES 2012 and 2016 Time Series.

    Undo
  4. Sep 21

    Since 1948, the American National Election Studies () has examined why Americans vote as they do. Vince Hutchings recently highlighted data from recently-added ANES questions, including those about Black Lives Matter and police misconduct.

    Undo
  5. Sep 16
    Show this thread
    Undo
  6. New article "Is the Death Penalty Debate Really Dead? Contrasting Capital Punishment Support in Canada and the United States" by draws on the Canadian Election Study and the 2016 ANES Time Series study.

    Undo
  7. Sep 7

    🚨🚨 New Publication Alert 🚨🧵 The Sept. Issue of includes joint work with : "So Many Questions, So Little Time: Integrating Adaptive Inventories into Public Opinion Research" 1/10

    Show this thread
    Undo
  8. Aug 28

    Your Random ANES Relationship of the Day: Feeling Thermometers for & Gays!

    Undo
  9. Aug 26

    Celebrating with a data tidbit on the desire to elect more women to public office. Data from the American National Election Study ()

    Undo
  10. Aug 25

    White Americans with advanced degrees (Masters, PhD, LLB) have only diverged from the less educated in party identification since 2008 (controls for age, income, gender, using data, excludes independents)

    Undo
  11. Aug 20

    Comparing survey data from 2016 and 2018, the number of Americans who said violence was “not at all” a justifiable means of pursuing political goals declined 10% in two years, from roughly 82% to 72%. 15/26

    Show this thread
    Undo
  12. Data collection for the 2020 ANES pre-election survey begins this week and lasts through November 2. Most respondents this year will complete a web-based survey, while a subset will be interviewed remotely via telephone or video link.

    Undo
  13. Congratulations and . We're glad ANES data could assist your research.

    Undo
  14. Aug 13

    New ⁦⁩ post from ⁦⁩ & me on the importance of Biden’s selection. Will choosing Kamala Harris as his running mate help Joe Biden win the presidency? - The Washington Post

    Undo
  15. Aug 12

    Questions included in the ANES balance continuity with innovation. To make comparisons over time, many questions remain identical. New questions are also added to capture timely issues as they arise. A continuity guide is at

    Undo
  16. Aug 12

    TODAY@ 11am ET: Dr. Hutchings discusses the history of , why it's an essential tool for the social sciences, its COVID updates, & politically-relevant, recent results like attitudes on the Black Lives Matter movement:

    Show this thread
    Undo
  17. Aug 7

    HT to & the Berkeley SDA site which made it easy for me to extract this data for a quick chart in 's story abt suburban women & Trump 📈

    Undo
  18. Aug 7

    8/12 @ 11am ET: Dr. Hutchings discusses the history of , why it's an essential tool for the social sciences, its COVID updates, & politically-relevant, recent results like attitudes on the Black Lives Matter movement:

    Undo
  19. Maria Nordbrandt uses ANES 2000 Time Series data to study environmental attitudes.

    Undo
  20. Jul 30

    New data from ! Someone who voted for Donald Trump is 3 times as likely to say that they have no trust at all in mail in ballots being counted accurately compared to a Clinton voter. Not at all + a little = 36% for Trump voters. 14.8% for Clinton voters.

    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·