So many academics forget that our goal, as a profession, is *not* to publish papers. It's to change the world.
-
Agreed that it's a problem, but given that we don't define "impact" rigorously, we are left with a choice between inevitably misaligned metrics or subjective and potentially biased ad-hoc judgments.https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2016/09/29/soft-bias-of-underspecified-goals/ …
We carry around giant, complex, nuanced, and wonderful neural networks to handle subjective, ad-hoc judgments.
-
-
True, but quantifying and aggregating those judgments makes the system more explicitly game-able via all the social games that the DNNs in our head were selected for. (In other words, that's how we originally got good-old-boys networks in charge of large swaths of academia.)
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.