Conversation

Replying to
I think what surprised me the most is that the pioneers of burnout research mostly see this as a boss/workplace/employer issue, and emphasise interventions that fix the working environment, NOT interventions to help the burnt out individual.
1
6
Anyway, I say all of this to provide background to what I’m about to say next: A huge chunk of mainstream burnout advice appears to be “get better work-life balance” or “do self care”. But this is NOT what the research says. The research says fix the work env or … get out!
2
11
This is either depressing or amazing news, depending on where you stand. Depressing: if you’re an employee with no power over your workplace, it’s just a matter of time before you burn out. Amazing: if you’re an employer, there are systematic ways to stave off burnout.
1
4
In fact, and this goes further, and this is a TRULY WILD thing, the thing that people don’t seem to want to talk about — your goal can be more than just “stave off burnout”, your goal can be “create work so engaging that your employees work long hours and feel totally energised.”
2
5
I’ll end this thread here. tl;dr — most people think in terms of ‘work-life balance’ but the research seems to be more nuanced. The reality: burnout is about a mismatch of job demands and resources, and if you align it, you can create ridiculously engaging work environments.
2
9
Whether that’s an unalloyed good is an exercise that’s left to the alert reader. But I guess there’s no harm if you design a workplace that’s somehow as engaging as, say, tennis? 🤷‍♂️ I’d like to see more writing on that!
2
4