Conversation

I’ve talked a lot about cognitive task analysis, which is this fairly new (30 yo) technique to extract expertise from the heads of experts. You know how pros can’t tell you how or what they’re doing? e.g. “It just feels right” Yeah, CTA solves for that. Some podcast clips. 👇
5
128
“What are some of the biggest challenges in CTA” “One major problem is figuring out who, exactly, has expertise (…) often we get recommended people who are well liked (but just not very good)”
Embedded video
0:56
779 views
1
11
Sometimes experts tend to leave out certain decisions that they make. Because it’s so intuitive to them. But this has problems when you’re training students. Clark tells the story of surgeons leaving out a major decision in training, resulting in bad outcomes for patients:
Embedded video
1:18
518 views
1
6
“We have found similar things in the energy industry, with people making decisions on where to drill wells” In this case, experts who have been doing this for awhile leave out specific decision steps when explicating their knowledge. So: training was bad!
Embedded video
1:00
465 views
1
6
Why does this happen? Well, experts may see what they’re doing with their actions, but they’re not as good with what goes on in their heads. Clark says that chunking is the heart of expertise, but chunking also means intuition and expert decision making becomes invisible.
2
4
As a result, traditional task analysis misses out on 80% of the instruction necessary for effective training, which CTA solves for. Clark also notes that the 1 cost benefit study he’s seen: 7x up front time costs, but 1/2 training time and save 2.5 person years per trainee.
Embedded video
1:25
316 views
1
6
Unfortunately it takes 5-6 months of training before someone can be really proficient in performing CTA. The reason is that experts tend to tell you about the decisions they typically make, but tend to forget what they do when unexpected things crop up. Good CTA captures that.
Embedded video
1:20
252 views
1
4
The cool thing about CTA is that it usually results in everything you need to create a new training program. The only thing is that you have to explicitly ask for is more examples, because you can do (some forms of) CTA without. But then you have instant training at the end!
Embedded video
1:08
208 views
1
4
Good question: “does it result in more training or job aids?” (Note: job aids could be decision tools, or it could be redesigned user interfaces like in the military or in NASDAQ’s fraud detection dept) Clark guesses in most CTA engagements, 80% training, 20% job aids.
Embedded video
0:59
171 views
1
1
Finally, I suspect CTA is going to be big soon. “The Obama administration heard about us and asked us to make a presentation (…) then they asked us to do engagements with federal agencies and those said no. This angered the White House. But now these folk are in foundations…”
Embedded video
1:18
219 views
1
2
“Eric Schmidt’s foundation looked into CTA, and they realised that the huge up front cost of training someone to do CTA … made it ideal for replacement with an AI system … so they funded one. And we’re now a year into this … and then we want to offer it to people to use.”
Embedded video
1:29
339 views
2
6
🤯 Apparently they’re a year away from a first release (at the point of the podcast), so I’ve reached out to ask for more details. But, holy hell, AI-powered CTA, coming to a knowledge system near you.
1
17