Conversation

One of the valuable things about reading expertise research is that you learn to pay special attention to “what makes someone a good X” type questions. Here’s an example of one that just LEAPT out at me. The Q is: “what makes for an A+ growth/full stack marketing person?”
Embedded video
1:20
1.1K views
2
17
“Finding someone with the diligence and discipline of running these loops … there’s definitely more than 25 people in the world (who are like that … but probably not more).”
Embedded video
1:06
223 views
2
3
This is, incidentally, a concrete example of the phenomenon I talked about in:
Quote Tweet
I know this is obvious, but I think it bears repeating: the higher up you go in some skill tree, the smaller the improvements become. Which leads to some interesting observations: 1) To a novice, an expert giving feedback to the merely good will seem like nitpicking.
Show this thread
2
2
Ask what differentiates a junior growth person from a senior growth person: <probably some answer about skill with a particular set of channels> Ask what makes for a great growth person? “They don’t chase after things.”
1
4
In case it’s not clear: it’s really REALLY hard to not chase after things! We’re talking about months of disciplined experimentation here, groping in the dark, not even sure if a channel+product+model+market combination exists out there that works perfectly for the business!
2
6
Replying to
There’s more context here that I couldn’t bring in. is referring to , who in turn has this whole thing about how growth’s job is to search for product+market+channel+model fit. (Caveat here being he doesn’t like the name ‘growth’ team)