Conversation

I know this is obvious, but I think it bears repeating: the higher up you go in some skill tree, the smaller the improvements become. Which leads to some interesting observations: 1) To a novice, an expert giving feedback to the merely good will seem like nitpicking.

112

Replying to

I think this depends a lot on the domain, and that it's not true in e.g. creative and research domains, where unlocking fundamentally new features of the domain leads to sudden massive growth in possibilities.

Cedric Chin

@ejames_c

Replying to

@DRMacIver

Interesting. I'd not considered this angle before, and will have to think about it for a bit. You're on to something, though — research (either mathematical or generic) does seem to have different gradations of skill.

4:41 PM · Jul 13, 2022TweetDeck

Replying to

In general I think there's an important split that is something like... creativity vs technical skill, and what you're describing is true of technical skill and not of creativity, largely because you're focused on domains where creativity is primarily in service to skill.

Replying to

Leaning into that distinction a little, I wonder if technical skill has less applicability when dealing with uncertainty. That is, if there is something fundamentally different about the 'skill' of exploring uncertainty (which involves getting lucky, developing taste, etc).

Show replies