Conversation

Cedric Chin
@ejames_c
The opening of Naming the Mind is a REMARKABLE anecdote: Danzinger walks into an Indonesian university, realises that there is a 'Western psychology' class and an 'Eastern psychology' class, and proposes to do a combined seminar ... And then fails to find any common ground.
Image
Image
2
49
Cedric Chin
@ejames_c
For context, I'm reading this because Lisa Feldman Barrett assigns it to everyone in her lab:
Quote Tweet
Cedric Chin
@ejames_c
“If you’re interested in psychology of the mind, there’s a book called Naming The Mind by Kurt Danzinger …” “What’s it about?” “It’s about where we got the idea that the human mind is populated by thoughts and feelings and perceptions. Because that’s not universal.” 🤯
Show this thread
Embedded video
1:16
449 views
1
3
Cedric Chin
@ejames_c
"Chinese thinking often gives no attention to distinctions which for Western minds are so traditional and so firmly established in thought and language, that we neither question them nor even become aware of them as distinctions."
Image
Image
Image
1
3
Dave Beck is offline
@DaveCBeck
Replying to
@ejames_c
alternative hypothesis that'd explain the same findings: different socio-emotional norms lead to (on average) different minds, which are reflected in different languages and categories. either is plausible imo, but my inclination is towards this side.
1
1