Conversation

It’s really interesting to see the evolution of Hacker News comments over time. My article on tacit knowledge is on the front page of HN again. The last time it was on the front page, a good chunk of the comments argued that tacit knowledge didn’t exist.
5
27
Now they mostly argue that deliberate practice is a completely orthogonal thing that leads to tacit knowledge. (Accurate, but misses the point!) Perhaps tacit knowledge is now more palatable to the HN commentari?
2
7
Replying to
Some old tweet threads to explain this:
Quote Tweet
My old post on The Problems with Deliberate Practice is on the front page of Hacker News. I wrote a comment that I think sums up my experience with Deliberate Practice pretty well: news.ycombinator.com/item?id=284551
Show this thread
Image
1
2
Quote Tweet
1/ One of my most persistent irritations is with the whole 'OH YOU NEED TO DO DELIBERATE PRACTICE' meme. Ugh, no, perhaps you don't. It depends on your domain. Deliberate practice has problems. Have you even tried? I've written about this before, but here's a thread.
Show this thread
1
Replying to and
If I’m remembering the commoncog tacit knowledge series right, the argument is that deliberate practice requires legible knowledge of what expertise looks like, out of the heads of experts If you just have expertise you can’t explain, then you can’t do deliberate practice.
1
1
Show replies
Replying to
Id argue that there are skills which are transferrable between fields which lend themselves to deliberate practice. Writing, for example. But thats probably me just missing the point of your statement. I mostly agree with you. Its complicated!
1
Show replies