Conversation

Replying to
Now they mostly argue that deliberate practice is a completely orthogonal thing that leads to tacit knowledge. (Accurate, but misses the point!) Perhaps tacit knowledge is now more palatable to the HN commentari?
2
7
Altogether now: if 👏 you 👏 don’t 👏 have 👏 good 👏 pedagogical 👏 development 👏 in 👏 your 👏 field 👏 you 👏 can’t 👏 do 👏 deliberate 👏 practice!
5
28
Some old tweet threads to explain this:
Quote Tweet
My old post on The Problems with Deliberate Practice is on the front page of Hacker News. I wrote a comment that I think sums up my experience with Deliberate Practice pretty well: news.ycombinator.com/item?id=284551
Show this thread
Image
1
2
Quote Tweet
1/ One of my most persistent irritations is with the whole 'OH YOU NEED TO DO DELIBERATE PRACTICE' meme. Ugh, no, perhaps you don't. It depends on your domain. Deliberate practice has problems. Have you even tried? I've written about this before, but here's a thread.
Show this thread
1
Replying to
It’d be nice to get a demographic of who commenters are. That would give an idea of how to speak their language Perhaps it’s their own filter bubble that is getting them closer but not there yet
1
Replying to
I find it really odd how the usual response to your articles on HN is not to engage with the idea, but to try and dismiss it or logically deconstruct it. I think HN people generally don't like them because you optimize for usefulness over logical correctness.
2
Replying to
maybe in the process of writing their comments that tacit knowledge doesn't exit. they achieved a new developmental level of tacit knowledge about tacit knowledge. Internal dialogue via critical commentary can have that effect. you convert yourself.
2
4