Conversation

Complexity by M Mitchell Waldrop is one of those weird books where I finish reading it and think "ahh, that was a good yarn, it's totally not useful" and then proceed to have my entire worldview changed in the subsequent months. Just. What.
8
201
To be precise, here’s what the book does, at least to my brain: First, it hammers home the concept of a complex adaptive system, giving you the tools to recognise it in the wild. It does so in story format, making it far easier to remember. So you start seeing CASs everywhere.
1
31
Second, it tells you all the ways that mechanistic methods of thinking about CASs fail. It does this subtly. Mostly through stories. So now you can recognise when someone is using a mechanistic explanation to reason about a CAS and feel very uncomfortable.
1
21
Third, because you are now distrustful of mechanistic explanations, you find that your thinking about CASs (the economy, business strategy, network effects) become irreparably changed. You no longer believe you can predict the future. You can’t go back.
10
42
Replying to and
I haven’t read that “Complexity” book but generally SFI/complex systems approaches permeate the way many think about decentralised + autonomous systems :) modelling as games doesn’t exactly solve them but it manages (sometimes) to highlight which micro-mechanisms…
1
2
Show replies
Replying to
You might enjoy Changing Conversations in Organisations by Patricia Shaw — no big new concepts, but an account of her experience making organisational change with a complexity-informed mindset. Her idea of "acting-in" really stuck with me as a technique.
1