Conversation

Cedric Chin
@ejames_c
"Readers of “Thinking: Fast and Slow” should read the book as a subjective account by an eminent psychologists, rather than an objective summary of scientific evidence." A fair summary of the reliability of TFaS:
replicationindex.com
A Meta-Scientific Perspective on “Thinking: Fast and Slow
2011 was an important year in the history of psychology, especially social psychology. First, it became apparent that one social psychologist had faked results for dozens of publications ( Second, …
6
59