Conversation

This is actually a really interesting way of thinking about critical thinking! Definitely never thought of it that way before ...
Quote Tweet
Replying to @C_Hendrick
I have started to think of critical thinking as the ability to "stew on the messiness of reality" without the lens of "frameworks layered between" your perception and an experience i.e. connecting your own dots commoncog.com/blog/reality-w h/t @ejames_c
4
18
My distaste of frameworks mostly stems from fear that it would lock me into certain ways of seeing the world. Which *has* bitten me (and my colleagues) in the past. I buy ’s argument that sitting with the messiness of uncertainty is important.
1
6
Replying to
I think the original framing is inside-out; experience is the result of mediation. IMO the question is always "What framework do we believe we're using and is it different from what we're in-fact using?" From William James' "Principles of Psychology" (1890), Ch. 11:
Image
1
2
Replying to and
One can define their way out of the problem, I suppose, but I don't see what that buys us. For example, "A framework is a type of mediation with a specific encoding/form/content/etc. So all frameworks mediate, but not all things that mediate are frameworks."
1
1
Replying to
AFAIK the term comes from John Dewey's "How We Think" (1910) For him, I think it's not about mediated vs. unmediated, but regulated vs. unregulated, reflective vs. unreflective, controlled vs. uncontrolled. Like a hand on a steering wheel.
Image
2
1
Replying to and
Dewey's picture is something like... A belief or thought arrives. We notice its arrival. We "press pause", tracing out both what preceded it (perceptions, prior beliefs, possible causes, etc.) and follows (implications, judgments, reactions, etc.).
1