I have very mixed feelings about my org design piece going viral.
On the one hand, yes: I *do* think it's useful for learning the skill; I do think I am better at it than most operators I've met. But I'm not entirely sure it's the correct mental model.
Conversation
One of the consequences of thinking very hard about the nature of thinking is that I'm very aware of my own believability.
And I'm not believable enough on this skill to say for sure. I think I'll need another 10 years of practice and reflection.
2
4
Replying to
Hi Cedric, your pieces take a while to read and digest. This creates a dilemma, should I read the entire thing now or digest the whole piece throught a span of atleast a month.
You always have a single cohesive story, why not make it a 3-4 part thriller ?
1
Replying to
I sometimes *do* write series — but this is all I plan to write about org design for awhile. For the very reasons articulated in the thread above.
I'll have more to say in 10 years.
Replying to
Typical Dexter bias. I was not talking about this piece but in general about your articles/post. Not all of us are blessed with an IQ of 140.
Take it lightly my sire, we need more light than some