Conversation

Replying to
I don't feel comfortable talking about them in public :P I will say that all 3 of the reasons you've proposed don't ring true to me, nor do many of the proposed answers in 's original thread. Right now, the state of my research is still a bit of a mess.
1
1
Related: twitter.com/ejames_c/statu Investigate the history of the use of the JV structure, and many things will follow.
Quote Tweet
So, working theory: businesses reflect the capital structure of their ecosystems (like how animals evolve to fit their environments), and judging an ecosystem for not having enough startups is a bit like saying there aren’t enough polar bears in a tropical rainforest.
Show this thread
1
1
The obvious answer is government granted monopolies. The approach I’ve taken is to ask the general question and then break it down per country — Korea (chaebols), Japan (zaibatsus), SEA and HK Chinese family conglomerates, Indian conglomerates, etc.
1
Replying to and
I think that's a good line of inquiry: there have been empirical studies (and common sense) that countries with stronger familial ties (vs more individualistic countries) have higher nepotism & corruption. Even within regions, eg Northern vs Southern Europe.
2
1
Aye. Another angle that I think the Western commentators miss out on is the influence of Chinese business practices in SEA/HK, on the way business is done in China today. It’s important to remember that the Chinese diaspora achieved prosperity before the mainland opened up.
1
1