I’m throughly enjoying reading the conversations in this thread
Interesting 👏
Conversation
Replying to
Quote Tweet
There are four categories of responses to this type of article. Each of these correspond to one of the four classical theories of truth. Let's examine each of them in turn, as an exercise in critical thinking. twitter.com/NickMilo/statu…
Show this thread
2
3
There is an even stronger argument embedded in my thread, that I didn’t make explicit.
Anyone who knows my writing knows that I am able to synthesise large amounts of information into my pieces.
And I don’t even practice full PS, as per . I am still shifting to it.
2
Have you ever written on your note-taking practice? Curious to see how it defers from .
I agree with the overall message that is trying to push though.
I also feel that spending too much time on ONLY PS is not worth it.
2
1
2
Ideally, you would be doing both PS and PI, but if you had to choose 1, progressive ideation should be prioritized.
On my end, I do very little PS and do more PI, but as you said, I don't have a body of work to show that's it's better.
1
2
I'm actually wondering if there are holes in my methodology and I'm looking to see where I can improve it.
1
More nuance:
Quote Tweet
Understanding the principles of a productivity methodology is often more important than understanding the trappings of the methodology itself.
Latter means you’re a slave to the step-by-step. Former means you’re able to adapt to your personal idiosyncrasies.
Show this thread