I'm not even talking about 'a little discredited', or 'still hotly debated'. It's been 20 years since V.S. Ramachandran popularised mirror neurons. And that's 20 years for evidence to slowly accumulate AGAINST the thesis.
You don't even have to look very far; just google.
Conversation
2
"Wait, are you telling me that someone who is trying to promote better thinking used an example of a highly discredited theory IN his example of better thinking?"
Uhh, yes.
So that makes me down-weight the technique even more.
2
The truth is that I don't really have a dog in this fight. I have tried Progressive Summarisation, and it's worked for me. If Milo had demonstrated good thinking, with novel insight scattered in his body of work, I would be willing to give his technique a go.
But, alas.
2
Replying to
I love this, and wished you’d included it in the piece. Everything you’ve said makes you more believable.
The other thing that needs fleshing out is a detailed worked example of application to a gnarly problem. e.g. the career switch, perhaps.
Replying to
Hey thanks (I just want to say my normal tone is not blustery, just the article b/c I felt compelled to push the convo)
Gosh, it will have to be something else until I'm out of the industry. There's an unspoken code of discretion about what goes on inside. You've got me thinking
1

