I’m throughly enjoying reading the conversations in this thread
Interesting 👏
Conversation
Replying to
Quote Tweet
There are four categories of responses to this type of article. Each of these correspond to one of the four classical theories of truth. Let's examine each of them in turn, as an exercise in critical thinking. twitter.com/NickMilo/statu…
Show this thread
2
3
There is an even stronger argument embedded in my thread, that I didn’t make explicit.
Anyone who knows my writing knows that I am able to synthesise large amounts of information into my pieces.
And I don’t even practice full PS, as per . I am still shifting to it.
I suppose that speaks to the power of the technique.
And so I wonder: has truly tried to put it into practice? Or is he just picking a fight because eyeballs?
2
What I would like to see is “I have tried PS, and I found these problems X, Y, and Z. I found workarounds A, B, and C for them. But I believe it is flawed because P and Q.”
This makes everything more believable, because it now comes from application.
2
Have you ever written on your note-taking practice? Curious to see how it defers from .
I agree with the overall message that is trying to push though.
I also feel that spending too much time on ONLY PS is not worth it.
2
1
2
Ideally, you would be doing both PS and PI, but if you had to choose 1, progressive ideation should be prioritized.
On my end, I do very little PS and do more PI, but as you said, I don't have a body of work to show that's it's better.
1
2
Show replies