sexual restraint for thee but not for me obvious exception for literal bondagehttps://twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/996474413045440512 …
-
-
also in the atomised social age, moral policing of private behavior is basically infeasible theres no social monolith nor even subcultures anymore no more ways to make a paraiah the final triumph of Exit
Show this thread -
I do think he might be right for certain populations. Something something high time preference. Not everyone does well long-term with an expanded choice set.https://twitter.com/eigenrobot/status/963223726597656578 …
Show this thread -
but the old approach of social shaming is dead, dead, dead, and people like him who try to revive these things are basically just cosplaying Herbert West
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I feel fine-to-positive about the first point, mixed-to-negative about the second, and the third is totally impossible. :/ I would guess the status quo ante . . . bellum? was enforced less by legal constraints and more by economic and social ones, and those are right out, now.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Modern day order: sex --> romance -->serial monogamy vs. forced order: marriage --> sex of the old days probably has ppl feeling equally repressed across the ages, as the social restraints on sex of the past have equally depressing implications on ppl restrained by their freedom.
-
I think this is probably correct. Something something Robin Hanson

- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
cf your earlier thoughts on triumph of Liberalism post-1848... how could you even reconstitute a Monarchical Right? "God and the King!" but neither the aristocrats nor the Church even _want_ the power
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.