idea: positive versus negative (affiliations? creeds?) positive: we are defined by belief in X negative: we are defined by not-belief in X hunch: positive creeds tend more oppressive than negative when they're popular
-
-
Show this thread
-
present: wokeness is positive, anti-wokeness negative right-left switch: in the 80s-90s, political evangelicalism was positive, defensive social liberalism negative (maybe? hm)
Show this thread -
positive creedos insist on gatekeeping, policing of beliefs negative possibly insist on hostility to policing of beliefs as policy, ie metapolicing (?)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We on the Right don't believe in looking a gift horse in the mouthpic.twitter.com/31D1LCNBil
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
indicates that, possibly bizarrely, the left and the right still agree that the left is winning
-
You can elect a president but you can't elect a culture.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Gatekeepers on The Right have been smashed, the most powerful ones were destroyed at the end of Bush 2/beginning of Obama. The Right can't say no to anyone anymore.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
thats a good point, i actually have never declared and more generally dont actually know what im talking about
End of conversation
-
-
-
supply and demand, heterogeneous goods: the right has very few people of his category(ies)
-
consider tho spose we take a crass story, "right is about white people, left about nonwhites" p generally nonwhites who declare for right get lionized by the right whites who declare for left are . . . tolerated gross oversimplification for but think theres something here
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.