But programmers have this discussion *all the time* productively (well, sometimes ;) ). They do so without a universal theory of what it means to be "best" or "best suited". And it's not purely favoritism or fanboyism.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes, there are plenty of unsettled issues in law. But the law is also a functional system that does a lot of good work despite never actually having had a complete ethical theory underlying it.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @olivertraldi @AlexGodofsky and
Consensually accepted as rules of the game by players who want to do things in the public sphere.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
hmmmmm I think you're trying to cram metasystematicity into a single systematic framework (??)
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
think about metarationality not as a system of beliefs but as a "stance", per @meaningness
to the extent we have beliefs, they tend to be weakly-held (and easy to overturn), but they're quite local and fluid
metarationality is more--a means of developing local beliefs? (???)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.