But programmers have this discussion *all the time* productively (well, sometimes ;) ). They do so without a universal theory of what it means to be "best" or "best suited". And it's not purely favoritism or fanboyism.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
that is the entire actual point of this discussion and this philosophical school. first acknowledge that there is no deep agreement, then come up with methods of reasoning that increase utility without requiring deep agreement.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
utility is approximately undefined too tbh :D we [econ tribe, now] gave up on that aeons ago
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
it's hard to come up with a non-specific objective function, is all desiderata depend on circumstances and participants
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
godspeed, get you to a glass of something strong thanks for talking!
5:37 PM - 20 Apr 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.