I think that's an excessively narrow view, and not how I approached it, although it certainly is congruent with "post-rationalist" (I am neither rationalist nor post-rationalist and haven't been in the past).
-
-
This is sort of part of the reason this thread's become such a mess. It's full of people trying to explain "postrationality" but actually only buy (different) parts of it themselves and believe different things...
-
Like, personally I'm pretty much a materialist and scientific realist who thinks that postrat thought is useful for thinking about high-level mental models of reality, while some others appear to think there's something subjective about reality itself.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
apparently postrationalists are just people with undiagnosed DSM disorders
-
oh, that explains it, the good ol' book covers me mostly
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.