you've been freebasing Samuel Johnson again, haven't you?
-
-
Replying to @ColumPaget @0knaomi and
Oh, reading the thread I see you're debating with crazy people, that would explain the super-rational 'tone'.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ColumPaget @0knaomi and
Who is crazy now in the thread according to you?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
1) The guy talking about "these people seem reasonable, but they have a TONE" - that's SJW style crazy. 2) The weird globe person who wants everyone to know about their Phd and thinks it's odd that people don't volunteer irrelevant information about themselves,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ColumPaget @0knaomi and
Predictable. Yes, I am odd. I study co-operation in spoken language. I am also so odd that I still believe that a person who criticizes someone's ideas or take on research might, just might, act in good faith and discuss relevant credentials. Your arrogance and ignorance resound!
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
you don't need any relevant credentials to criticize someone for making an argument around a mysterious 'tone' rather than around facts. Also, you are not helping yourself by insulting everyone and telling them they're "predictable". Makes you sound like Donald Trump.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ColumPaget @0knaomi and
In your opinion, which is irrelevant, isn't it? You are not a psychologist or a doctor or a professor or a teacher, are you? I wrote "predictable" in reference to the discussion of "algorithm" earlier in the thread. Your writing is as narcissistic as it is silly. (n.a.d.)
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
opinions and qualifications are both irrelevant, what's relevant is facts. Claiming that some people have a 'tone' isn't factual debate, it's one step above accusations of witchery. You've been asked if you have a point to make, & so far all you've done is wave your degree at us.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ColumPaget @0knaomi and
Only your facts are relevant to you. You have not read the thread or the other threads referred to. You are ignorant about this matter. You are arrogant in that you need not educate yourself before commenting. I am waiting for you to read the threads. Then "facts" are discussed.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Globe_WR @ColumPaget and
OκULTRA XP 🧿 Retweeted GES Waterloo Region
Ah, the "educate yourself shitlord" argument P.S. I'm still waiting for Amitay to provide any kind of evidence that the approaches he support (including, implicitly, what Zucker did) result in a different incidence of "desistance"https://twitter.com/GESRobert/status/984072968035708932 …
OκULTRA XP 🧿 added,
GES Waterloo Region @Globe_WRReplying to @ColumPaget @0knaomi and 12 othersOnly your facts are relevant to you. You have not read the thread or the other threads referred to. You are ignorant about this matter. You are arrogant in that you need not educate yourself before commenting. I am waiting for you to read the threads. Then "facts" are discussed.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
This thread is cancer
-
-
Replying to @eigenrobot @ColumPaget and
I think it's funny. It's always funny when an anti-trans dooder suddenly explodes after "reeling it in" for a while (Amitay is less funny because his crap has been dragged on by TERFs from one blawg to another for a long while)
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.