Again, your reformulation is shockingly poor. It is clear that you don't care who I am. It is odd, though, that you give no information about yourself. It is rather uninformative, plus you are following an algorithm already discussed in this thread. How predictable...
-
-
Replying to @Globe_WR @docamitay and
OκULTRA XP 🧿 Retweeted GES Waterloo Region
Me being a DARPA bio-AI does not change the fact that evidence for ROGD, contagious trans, pernicious overdiagnosis, and such is on par with evidence for nessie.https://twitter.com/GESRobert/status/984052672083910656 …
OκULTRA XP 🧿 added,
GES Waterloo Region @Globe_WRReplying to @0K_ultra @0knaomi and 12 othersAgain, your reformulation is shockingly poor. It is clear that you don't care who I am. It is odd, though, that you give no information about yourself. It is rather uninformative, plus you are following an algorithm already discussed in this thread. How predictable...2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @0K_ultra @docamitay and
I asked the ungood doctor a single honest question - whether there is any evidence that the methodologies he seems to support with regards to care of teenagers with gender issues are associated with more desistance the ungood doctor is silient, so I doubt such evidence exists
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
you've been freebasing Samuel Johnson again, haven't you?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ColumPaget @0knaomi and
Oh, reading the thread I see you're debating with crazy people, that would explain the super-rational 'tone'.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ColumPaget @0knaomi and
Who is crazy now in the thread according to you?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
1) The guy talking about "these people seem reasonable, but they have a TONE" - that's SJW style crazy. 2) The weird globe person who wants everyone to know about their Phd and thinks it's odd that people don't volunteer irrelevant information about themselves,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ColumPaget @0knaomi and
Predictable. Yes, I am odd. I study co-operation in spoken language. I am also so odd that I still believe that a person who criticizes someone's ideas or take on research might, just might, act in good faith and discuss relevant credentials. Your arrogance and ignorance resound!
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
you don't need any relevant credentials to criticize someone for making an argument around a mysterious 'tone' rather than around facts. Also, you are not helping yourself by insulting everyone and telling them they're "predictable". Makes you sound like Donald Trump.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ColumPaget @0knaomi and
In your opinion, which is irrelevant, isn't it? You are not a psychologist or a doctor or a professor or a teacher, are you? I wrote "predictable" in reference to the discussion of "algorithm" earlier in the thread. Your writing is as narcissistic as it is silly. (n.a.d.)
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
tits or gtfo
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.