No it really isn’t. Read that Turkheimer post please.
-
-
Replying to @bechhof
why dont you point out the specific error you think is being made that cripples the analysis like we learned in seminars instead of gesturing wildly at another paper
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eigenrobot
Because I want you to read the piece. It isn’t just that the derivative is different; it’s an unestimable function of the whole environment space which can go all over the place.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bechhof
boy youre not going to like the entire body of all empirical work ever produced
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eigenrobot
This is really hard to respond to without spewing lecture about causal inference.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It was more important for
@eigenrobot, who seems too impatient to read anything that long (to his detriment).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bechhof
in fact I read the entire piece immediately after you linked it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
Fair enough. I stand corrected. Please accept my apology.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
i mean youre not wrong about my impulsiveness heuristic generally but i do tend to read compulsively ^^
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.