“Your gender means that you’re biologically incapable of doing this job and should never have been hired” isn’t a fucking debate.
-
-
Replying to @DrNerdLove
the fact that you think this is a legitimate reading of the memo is proof you're communicating in bad faith.
3 replies 4 retweets 67 likes -
Replying to @drethelin @DrNerdLove
You are either being sarcastic, or have no idea what the phrase "bad faith" means.
2 replies 0 retweets 41 likes -
Replying to @jcape @DrNerdLove
"Bad faith (Latin: mala fides) is double mindedness or double heartedness in duplicity, fraud, or deception."
1 reply 3 retweets 23 likes -
-
Replying to @jcape @DrNerdLove
Willful ignorance of the content of a text you are commenting on so that you can condemn it is bad faith.
1 reply 4 retweets 31 likes -
Replying to @drethelin @DrNerdLove
If you think XYZ is a legitimate reading, arguments based on XYZ are, by definition, not made in bad faith.
2 replies 0 retweets 25 likes -
Replying to @jcape @DrNerdLove
But if I think XYZ is a completely illegitimate reading, then arguments based on XYZ are either lies or willful ignorance of the source.
2 replies 3 retweets 13 likes -
anyway, this argument about definitions is completely irrelevant to the actual conversation. I'm done with this tangent.
2 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @drethelin @DrNerdLove
Come back when you learn how to form a coherent thought and put it in a sentence.
4 replies 1 retweet 43 likes
as a scientist,,,, please reThink this
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.