write a review
-
-
-
My blood pressure though!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
yeah, seen that. Plain wrong but interesting how commentators from both sides are handling the "archive method" thing (cc
@Econ_Marshall)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This wasn't my point. in the above quote, a historian dismiss other historians saying they don't get how historical method works
-
that's why Macleangate (as other academic feuds) is a mess: ideological/methodological/substantive disagreements intermingled, money on top
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
if you need additional knowledge to believe her story, then I'd better give up reading the books, and the reviews, because it means...
-
...that the book will convince only readers already in agreement with her arguments, and enrage those with opposed premises
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i certainly didn't imply this, you're misreading me. My question was whether her story will change any reader's mind, or convince some
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.