In this specific case, they are.
-
-
Replying to @boatfloating
I mean was there some aspect of law not followed in this trial? It's totally possible But if the trial was carried out lawfully . . .
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
I believe Roy Bryant and JW Milam's trial was carried out lawfully, too
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @boatfloating
which was a bad outcome, as was this almost surely but condition on state at beginning of the trial; what was process issue?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @boatfloating
hmm yes lemme refine (1) view today's trial outcome as a draw from a distribution defined by the conditions at the beginning of the trial
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @boatfloating
(2) is your objection that the initial conditions were bad, or that the draw was fixed? (3) if it's the initial conditions . . .
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @boatfloating
. . . why be especially upset when the outcome of the draw is known? I think (3) is what I'm trying to understand in others today. Because
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
Because, this is both another confirmation that the system is rigged, and that things are not getting better
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I hope that's not what I'm conveying! Weary cynicism is very far from my emotional stance in re: this case.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.