erring on the side of "not punishing by depriving people of liberty" seems maximally-desirous and aim should be to extend that benefit
(2) is your objection that the initial conditions were bad, or that the draw was fixed? (3) if it's the initial conditions . . .
-
-
. . . why be especially upset when the outcome of the draw is known? I think (3) is what I'm trying to understand in others today. Because
-
I think the initial conditions were rotten (and the circumstances that lead to them worse); but maybe this was fair coin toss in a bad game.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.