the targets? not sure exactly what you mean, it's the front page article on NYT rnpic.twitter.com/7MMviDm1j4
-
-
oh hey i didn't notice you were responding. I meant targets as in the people who are supposed to benefit from separating
-
and with the full headline i'm realizing i've attended one of these separate (additional, not segregated) commencements
-
definitely self-congratulatory, although not necessarily defensive. now i feel as though i've overreacted
-
i'm definitlely tweeting drunk, but all of it without having read the article, "additional" vs "segregated" does seem important
-
this is the thread of
@eigenrobot's excitement slowly deteriorating -
well fuck now i'm taking all sides. rejoice in being weirdo, and also sweet you access to power to organize a second commencement???
-
here i am throwing all my opinions in a big ol hole. watch for their return later as i pretend all of this never happened
-
or just never overenthusisatically responded to a way too strong headline
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
