@eigenrobot you might be interested: the last chapter of The Nobel Factor has a pretty solid soc-dem answer to the Hayek planning critique
-
-
Replying to @nickchk @eigenrobot
Or the price-signals critique or however it would be shorthanded
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nickchk @eigenrobot
Now I vaguely remember having already mentioned this before. If so, I shall die of embarrassment
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
No I do not! And I would be very curious to read it. This is Offer and Soderberg?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eigenrobot
Yes, that's the one. The rest of the book is pretty interesting too if a little hand-wavy
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yeah I'll add that to my stack. I've been latently curious how we got from the AEA of Illiberal Reformers to . . . whatever we have now
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @Reisen_0
ugh although now reading the Amazon reviews less want to read it because ECON IS/NOT SCIENCE is pretty well-flogged for me :(
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
I can see how people get that impression from the book but that's not really an argument it makes (although it's not super clear about it)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nickchk @eigenrobot
I kept thinking it was veering towards it but it would then pull back.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Huuuh okay. I will avoid reviews apart from your endorsement and plow through, in this case ^^
-
-
Replying to @eigenrobot
Not to say it's without its polemics of course. It's got plenty of those
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.